Buy ideas
Open-market purchases (code P) only. Grants, option exercises and tax withholding are stripped before anything is scored.
Sell / trim ideas
Discretionary open-market sales only. Pre-scheduled 10b5-1 plan sales, 49% of all insider selling, are removed, because they were committed to months before the insider knew anything.
Politicians
STOCK Act disclosures from the House of Representatives. Members report trades up to 45 days after the fact, in dollar ranges, spouse and dependent trades included. This is transparency data, not a signal: the reporting lag alone makes it untradeable, and no return claim is attached to it.
Backtest
Forward returns of every historical signal, by tier, against a benchmark over the same window. Sample sizes are shown because a good-looking average over eleven signals is not evidence of anything.
Method
What gets thrown away, and what the score is actually measuring.
Most of a Form 4 feed is noise
Across 103,733 non-derivative Form 4 rows in a single measured quarter, only 5.7% were open-market purchases. The rest of the volume is administrative: 26.0% tax withholding (code F), 23.8% stock grants (A), 15.7% option exercises (M), plus gifts, conversions and transfers. None of that is a person choosing to buy or sell. A tracker that shows you all of it is showing you payroll, not conviction.
The sell-side filter is the edge
Insider selling has a reputation for being uninformative, and for the most part that reputation is earned. The reason is 10b5-1: an executive adopts a written plan months in advance that sells a fixed amount on a fixed schedule, then the sale prints as a Form 4 the day it executes. It looks like a decision. It is a calendar entry. 49% of every sell row across this dataset is one of these, rising to 56% in the most recent measured quarter. They are removed before scoring. What survives is an insider who chose, on a specific day, to sell stock they were under no obligation to sell.
What the score is made of
- Size, log-scaled with a floor. Half of all insider purchases are under $15,661. Those are optics. A floor keeps them from registering, and the log scale keeps one enormous buy from swamping a page.
- Change in the insider's own stake. A $200k buy from someone who already owns $80m of stock is a rounding error. The same $200k from someone doubling their position is the actual signal. Percentage of stake is the honest measure.
- Role weight. CEOs and CFOs see the whole business. Directors see a board pack once a quarter. Ten-percent holders are usually funds and PE vehicles rather than humans, and are weighted lowest.
- Novelty. A first purchase in twelve months from a person who has never bought counts for more than the twentieth buy from a habitual accumulator.
- Cluster. Several distinct insiders moving the same way inside a short window is the single most durable pattern in this dataset. One buyer is an opinion. Four is a meeting.
Guards against bad data
Filed prices are sometimes garbage. In one measured quarter, three rows carried 99.9999% of the total dollar value of all purchases. One filer reported a price of $24,035,774 per share. Any dollar-weighted ranking that does not defend against this will put a typo at the top of the page. Prices that fall outside a sane band against the market close are flagged and excluded from dollar-weighted scoring rather than silently trusted.
What this is not
This is a filter and a score over public filings. It does not know anything the market does not already have access to, it has no view on your situation, and a tier is not a price target. The backtest tab shows what the scoring has actually done historically, including when that is unflattering.